pdf35

Ribogospod. nauka Ukr., 2026; 1(75): 153-177
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2026.01.153
UDC [639.371.52:639.3.032]:504.06(477.43)

Received: 13.01.2025
Received in revised form: 05.03.2026
Published: 31.03.2026

Analysis of environmental conditions during intensive growing of crossbred age-0+ framed carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) in the conditions of PJSC “Khmelnytskrybhosp”

А. Bazaieva, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0000-0002-0509-1349, Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
N. Chuzhma,  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0000-0002-9901-0991, Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
V. Pryimak, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0009-0005-2054-0543, Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
Т. Hryhorenko, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , ORCID ID 0000-0002-8769-1443, Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

Purpose. To provide an assessment of the state of the hydrochemical and hydrobiological regimes of fish ponds during intensive cultivation of crossbred age-0+ carp in the conditions of PrJSC “Khmelnytskrybhosp”.

Methodology. The study was conducted during the growing season of 2023 in the conditions of the farm of PrJSC “Khmelnytskrybgosp” on four 0.25 ha ponds​​, an average depth of 1.5 m. In the experimental ponds (No. 2 and No. 3), crossbred age-0+ carps were grown, which were obtained as a result of reciprocal crossing of the offspring of the sparsely scaled Nyvky hatchery line and the Antoniny-Zozulenets intrabreed types of the Ukrainian framed carp breed, as well as age-0+ carp of pure lines (ponds No. 4 and No. 5). The cultivation of juvenile carp was carried out in monoculture at a stocking density of 100 thousand ind./ha and intensive technology using high-protein artificial feeds from the RAANAN company (Israel). To intensify the development of the natural food supply, cattle humus was introduced into the ponds in the spring at the rate of 2.0 t/ha. During the cultivation period, the water temperature and dissolved oxygen content were monitored daily, and the hydrochemical and hydrobiological state of the experimental ponds was investigated once a month. In this case, generally accepted methods in hydrochemistry, hydrobiology, and fish farming were used. The data obtained as a result of the studies were subjected to statistical processing using the MS Excel.

Findings. The environmental conditions were generally satisfactory and suitable for growing age-0+ carp. The main chemical parameters of water were within the regulatory values ​​​​accepted in fish farming. The average biomass of phytoplankton during the growing season was within 6.9-16.7 mg/dm3, zooplankton - 4.54-5.00 g/m3, zoobenthos - 0.34-1.91 g/m2. Control of environmental conditions and timely application and adjustment of feeding of juvenile carp with artificial high-protein feeds, taking into account the development of prey organisms, ensured high productivity. At the same time, the average weight of grown age-0+ fish was within 44.7-56.2 g, the yield of 3-day-old larvae stocked for cultivation was 37.9-39.3%, and fish productivity was 1769.0-2144.0 kg/ha, with artificial feed consumption at the level of 1.13-1.45 kg/kg.

Originality. The hydrochemical and hydrobiological regimes of fish ponds during the cultivation of age-0+ new commercial carp lines using intensive cultivation technology were studied and analyzed.

Practical Value. The study into the environmental conditions of cultivation during the growing season allowed responding in a timely manner to changes in the ecosystem of the pond and taking the necessary measures to obtain the maximum desired productivity.

Keywords: natural food supply, hydrochemical regime, phytoplankton, zooplankton, zoobenthos, age-0+ crossbred and pure line carp.

REFERENCES

  1. Hrytsynyak, І. I., Gurbik, V. V., Kurinenko, H. А. (2022). Native Types of Carp in Aquaculture of Ukraine (a Review). Hydrobiological Journal, 58(1), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1615/HydrobJ.v58.i1.40
  2. Hulata, G. (1995). A review of genetic improvement of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) and other cyprinids by crossbreeding, hybridization and selection. Aquaculture, 129, 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)00244-I
  3. Balon, E. K. (1995). Origin and domestication of the wild carp, Cyprinus carpio: From Roman gourmets to the swimming flowers. Aquaculture, 129, 3-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)00227-F  
  4. Balon, E. K. (2004). About the oldest domesticates among fishes December. Journal of Fish Biology, 65(s1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00563.x 
  5. Horváth, L., Kovács, É., Csorbai, B., Hegyi, Á., Lefler, K., Müller, T., & Urbányi, B. (2022). Carp Breeding in the Carpathian Basin with a Sustainable Utilization of Renewable Natural Resources. Life, 12(10), 16-61. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12101661 
  6. Hrytsyniak, I. I., Hrynzhevskyi, M. V., Tretiak, O. M., Kiva, M. S., & Mruk, A. I. (2008). Fermerske rybnytstvo. Kyiv: Herb.
  7. Oleksiienko, O. O., & Hrytsyniak, I. I. (2007). Vnutrishnoporodna struktura ukrainskykh koropiv. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 1, 21-27.
  8. Krasnopolska, O. V., & Kurinenko, H. A. (2023). Analiz rybnytsko-biolohichnykh pokaznykiv dvolitok, otrymanykh vid retsyproknykh skhreshchuvan antoninsko-zozulenetskykh ta halytskykh ramchastykh koropiv. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 2, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.15407/fsu2023.02.071
  9. Hrishyn, B. O. (2014). Rezultaty oderzhannia pomisnykh koropiv vid skhreshchuvannia antoninsko-zozulenetskoho i liubinskoho vnutrishnoporidnykh typiv zavodskym metodom. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats VNAU, 1(83), 1: Suchasni problemy selektsii, rozvedennia ta hihiieny tvaryn, 93-97.
  10. Pryimak, V., Kolesnik, R., Syrovatka, D., Kurinenko, H., & Hrytsyniak, I. (2025). Otsinka efektu heterozysu za produktyvnymy pokaznykamy pry riznykh variantakh promyslovykh skhreshchuvan koropiv ukrainskykh porid. Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 4(74), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2025.04.237
  11. Kurinenko, G. A., & Syrovatka, D. A. (2022). Characteristics of local annuals of Galician and Lyubyn carp as a component of synthetic selection. Forecasts and prospects of scientific discoveries in agricultural sciences and food: International scientific conference: Riga, the Republic of Latvia (August 30–31, 2022):proceed Riga, Latvia: Baltija Publishing, 122-126. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-238-8-29
  12. Fu, D., Xiao, M., Hayward, A., Fu, Y., Liu, G., Jiang, G., & Zhang, H. (2014). Utilization of crop heterosis: a review. Euphytica, 197, 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1103-7 
  13. Devlin, R. H., Biagi, C. A., Sakhrani, D., & Fujimoto, T. (2022). An assessment of hybridization potential between Atlantic and Pacific salmon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 79(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2021-0083 
  14. Hayden, B., Pulcini, D., Kelly-Quinn, M., O’Grady, M., Caffrey, J., McGrath, A., & Mariani, S. (2010). Hybridization between two cyprinid fishes in a novel habitat: Genetics, morphology and life-history traits. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10(169), 1471-2148. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-169 
  15. Hermawan, D., Sutarjo, G. A., Prasetyo, D., Dahlia, L., & Arisandy, D. (2024). Reproductive performance of crossbreeding between local female and imported male koi at CV. Indokoi Malang. The 5 th International Conference on Bioenergy and Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture Technology (ICoN-BEAT 2024): BIO Web Conf., 143, 02005. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202414302005 
  16. Pant, D. R., & Kumar, J. (2025). Review on fish Polyculture practices: Sustainability, innovations and challenges. Environment Conservation Journal, 26(1), 257-263. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.29052881
  17. Limbu, S., Shoko, A., Lamtane, H., Kishe-Machumu, M. A., Joram, M. C., Mbonde, A. S., Mgana, H. F., & Mgaya, Y. D. (2016). Fish polyculture system integrated with vegetable farming improves yield and economic benefits of small-scale farmers. Aquaculture Research, 48(7).https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13188
  18. Roy, K., Másílko, J., Kajgrova, L., Kuebutornye, F. K. A., Oberle, M., & Mraz, J. (2023). End-of-season supplementary feeding in European carp ponds with appropriate plant protein and carbohydrate combinations to ecologically boost productivity: Lupine, rapeseed and, triticale. Aquaculture, 577, 739906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739906
  19. Krazhan, S. A., & Khyzhniak, M. I. (2014). Pryrodna kormova baza rybohospodarskykh vodoim. Kherson: Oldi-plius.
  20. Hryhorenko, T. V., Postoienko, D. M., Shumyhai, I. V., Dobrianska O. P., & Bazaieva A. M. (2019). Ekolohichnyi stan rybnytskykh staviv za vyroshchuvannia populiatsii Antoninsko-Zozulenetskoi porody koropa. Ahroekolohichnyi zhurnal, 4, 65-73. https://doi.org/10.33730/2077-4893.4.2019.189460
  21. Kuts, U. S., Tuchapska, H. Ya., Dobrianska, O. P., & Kurinenko, H. A. (2021). Vplyv ekolohichnykh umov na vyroshchuvannia tsoholitok koropo-sazanovykh hibrydiv riznoho pokhodzhennia. Ahroekolohichnyi zhurnal, 1, 106-114. https://doi.org/10.33730/2077-4893.1.2021.227247
  22. Oborskyi, V., Kurinenko, H., Simon, M., Pryimak, V., Hrytsyniak, I. & Kuts, U. (2025). Suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku stavovoi akvakultury u Khmelnytskii oblasti na prykladi PrAT «Khmelnytskrybhosp». Rybohospodarska nauka Ukrainy, 3(73), 25-56. https://doi.org/10.61976/fsu2025.03.025 
  23. Hryhorenko, T. V., Samchyshyna, L. V., Chuzhma, N. P., Bazaieva, A. M., Savenko, N. M., Oborsky, V. P., & Mykhailenko, N. G. (2021). Assessment of ecological conditions for growing the market-size fish in the Kantivka fattening pond (Khmelnychchyna, Ukraine). Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences,4(3), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.32718/ujvas4-3.06 
  24. Phonmat, P., Chaichana, R., Rakasachat, C., Klongvessa, P., Chanthorn, W., & Moukomla, S. (2025). Phytoplankton and Zooplankton Assemblages Driven by Environmental Factors Along Trophic Gradients in Thai Lentic Ecosystems. Diversity, 17(6), 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17060372
  25. Dulić, Zorka, Marković, Zoran, Živić, Miroslav, Ćirić, Miloš, Stanković, Marko, Subakov-Simić, Gordana, & Živić, Ivana (2014). The response of phytoplankton, zooplankton and macrozoobenthos communities to change in the water supply from surface to groundwater in aquaculture ponds. Annales de Limnologie - International Journal of Limnology, 50(2), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2014005
  26. Meng, J., Yu, Z., Miao, M., Kong, Q., Zhang, Y., & Liu, J. (2017). Differentiated Responses of Plankton and Zoobenthos to Water Quality Based on Annual and Seasonal Analysis in a Freshwater Lake. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 26(2), 755-764. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/66713
  27. Arsan, O. M., et al. (2006). Metody hidroekolohichnykh doslidzhen poverkhnevykh vod. Romanenko, V. D. (Ed.). Kyiv: Lohos.
  28. 28. Voda rybohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv. Zahalni vymohy ta normy. (2013). SOU-05.01.-37-385:2006. Standart minahropolityky Ukrainy. Kyiv: Ministerstvo ahrarnoi polityky Ukrainy.
  29. Algae of Ukraine: diversity, nomenclature, taxonomy, ecology and geography. (Vol. 1). Cyanoprocaryota, Euglenophyta, Chrysophyta, Xanthophyta, Raphidophyta, Phaeophyta, Dinophyta, Cryptophyta, Gaucocystophyta, and Rhodophyta. (2006). Tsarenko, P. M., Wasser, S. P., & Nevo, E. (Eds.). Ruggell: Ganter Verlag.
  30. Algae of Ukraine: diversity, nomenclature, taxonomy, ecology and geography. (Vol. 2). Bacillariophyta. (2009). Tsarenko, P. M., Wasser, S. P., & Nevo, E. (Eds.). Ruggell: Ganter Verlag.
  31. Algae of Ukraine: diversity, nomenclature, taxonomy, ecology and geography. (Vol. 3). Chlorophyta. (2011). Tsarenko, P. M., Wasser, S. P., & Nevo, E. (Eds.). Ruggell: Ganter Verlag.
  32. Rudescu, L. (1960). Fauna Republicii Socialiste Romania. (Vol. II, fasc. 2),Rotatoria, 1192.
  33. Bledzki, Leszek A., & Rybak, Jan Igor (2016). Freshwater Crustacean Zooplankton of Europe Cladocera & Copepoda (Calanoida, Cyclopoida). Key to species identification. Swizzerland: Springer International Publishing Swizzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29871-9
  34. Andriushchenko, A. I., Baltadzhi, R. A., Vovk, N. I., Hrynzhevskyi, M. V., Hudyma, B. I., & Demchenko, I. T., et al. (1998). Metody pidvyshchennia pryrodnoi ryboproduktyvnosti staviv. Hrynzhevskyi, M. V. (Ed.). Kyiv.
  35. Borbat, M. O., et al. (2003). Haluzevyi zbirnyk normatyvno-tekhnolohichnoi dokumentatsii z rozvedennia ta vyroshchuvannia promyslovo-tsinnykh ryb. Kyiv.
Home2026№ 1/2026 (75)2026_01-153_177-Pryimak